Thanks Judy, That's exactly what I meant, very sloppy language on Speros' part and from my response comes such unwarranted personal attacks just shows me someone who hasn't been challenged much and probably needs to. Just because someone agressively disagrees with his commentary doesn't mean that person has deep personal problems. It's pretty childish behaviour if you ask me.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "oneradiantbeing" > <oneradiantbeing@> wrote: > > > > This comment is in response to "sgrayatlarge." who erroneously > > compared adult homo-eroticism (homosexuality) with incest and > > bestiality. > > David, I think you missed the poster's point. In your > letter to the editor, you had written: > > "We will never become a nation that breathes integrity > so long as there is not a safe atmosphere wherein people > of all sexual persuasions can live openly and equally." > > It appears to me that he was suggesting your phrase > "all sexual persuasions" was too sweeping, since it > would include bestiality, incest, and pedophilia, > among other sexual practices for which even you would > probably not want this country to provide a "safe" > atmosphere. > > You probably didn't mean "all sexual persuasions" to > be taken that broadly, but there was no need for you > to take such a nasty swipe at sgrayatlarge for > pointing out that your use of language was sloppy. > He explicitly said he didn't think there was anything > wrong with homosexuality, so your charge of homophobia > is quite unwarranted. >
