And more than that, new.morning poops in his pants, and eats yellow sand in the sand box.
And someone killed Kenny! But I think a friend of mine said it best: " I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. Not even I would do that, and I'm America's bad boy! It's craptacular. I need all my brain cells firing to outwit my invisible enemies. It'll be just like the Swiss Family Robinson, only with more cursing... We're gonna live like kings... Damn hell ass kings! No. We have to reach people whose opinions actually matter! (when arguing that the Springfield kids should not expose their parents' hypocrisy on the internet) " Don't post personal attacks on others ==> superficial, cartoonish, shallow, smacks of fascism, it's a very foolish idea, has the potential to destroy this group, machinations [scheming towards EVIL ends] obergruppenfurhers , secret domination motives, worthless duplicity strategy, egregious destructive, conspired to excise the free speech traitorous fundamentally dishonest blatant attempt to destroy declaring the Tiananmen Square massacre as just the end of a democratic experiment. ---------------------------------------- Judy: I think this is an incredibly naive idea that doesn't take the real world, let alone FFL, into account. It's a superficial, cartoonish, shallow view of human interaction that makes nonexistent black/white distinctions. It's also an idea that smacks of fascism, in that it approves of rules so vague that they can be twisted to apply--or not apply--to anything, depending on the whim of the administrator, who obviously likes some people here more than others (he wouldn't be human if he didn't). In my view, it's a very foolish idea that has the potential to destroy this group. --- In [email protected], billy jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You�ve already proved that [Rick]are easily manipulated by the pathetic sentimentality of Bronte and the machinations of New Morning. > Turn it over to your seconds-in-command, your obergruppenfurhers - New Morning for �obvious� outrages, Bronte Baxter for �emotionally insensitive� offences and Edg for �intuitively recognizable� insults. > and New Morning�s insistence that you are not doing your job, which you have explicitly sympathized with, you are subjecting the rest of us to the secret domination motives of these two members. worthless and the duplicity in Baxter and New Morn�s domination strategy especially egregious and destructive. > > 4. I believe that New Morning has conspired to excise the free speech of FFL members. I believe this renders her actions nothing less than traitorous to the spirit of FFL. I consider her efforts not only fundamentally dishonest but a blatant attempt to destroy the free-speech integrity of this forum. > > For you, Rick Archer, to frame these domination attempts as �just an exercise� is like the Maoist officer declaring the Tiananmen Square massacre as �just the end of a democratic experiment�.
