Edg, Willytex is quoting old posts (mostly mine) from FFL and alt.m.t. Didn't you click on the links?
--- In [email protected], Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rick, > > Er, after a hundred posts from folks who seemed to agree to warn then > penalize someone for flaming, I would think that you'd have warned > Willy for his previous post. Now the one below seems to go way over > the top into very obvious flaming. > > Are you going to do this warn-then-ban bit? > > Edg > > > --- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" > <willytex@> wrote: > > > > jstein wrote: > > > I'd ask Barry to provide examples to the contrary, > > > but there wouldn't be any point. > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/143310 > > > > No, the above is what I actually wrote, citing Wilber, > > and showing you to be a liar. > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/143497 > > > > As you know, Willytex, what I was calling Barry's fantasy > > was *not* that Lenz had levitated. Liar that you are, you > > omitted the context to make it seem that I had. > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/140399 > > > > Your team of profligate liars and racketeers lost > > in '06 and continues to lose. > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/143504 > > > > Horseshit. > > > > Classics from the alt.m.t. Groove Yard > > http://tinyurl.com/74d95 > > > > From Judy Stein to Willytex: > > > > Liar. > > No, liar. > > Wrong, liar. > > Bite me, toots. > > Non sequitur, liar. > > Yes, it does, liar. > > Willytex is a liar. > > No, she did not, liar. > > Yeah, it's a non sequitur. > > As usual, Willytex is the liar. > > Outright, deliberate falsehood. > > Bob Dole is a liar, just like you. > > Another right-winger bent on deception. > > You've been lying your head off for months. > > And that's just an outright, deliberate falsehood. > > You snipped the context to obscure that fact, liar. > > Boy, do you need a course in the fundamentals of logic. > > > > > His "opinion" about the general usage here of the > > > term "liar" is also incorrect, in my observation. > > > It's rare that someone is called a liar for merely > > > expressing an opinion about someone else. If it > > > does happen, it's likely to be because the person > > > using the term knows that the person expressing > > > the "opinion" has evidence that clearly documents > > > the inaccuracy of that "opinion." > > >
