jim_flanegin wrote:
> --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
>   
>> On Sep 13, 2007, at 7:53 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> OK, no problem-- I'll just add that I was checking today several
>>> times, and the Yahoo advanced search indicated only 28 this
>>> afternoon.:-)
>>>       
>> Well now it indicates 34, Jim.  And funnily enough, I have 39 
>>     
> emails of 
>   
>> yours since early Saturday morning.  I'm sure you wouldn't be 
>>     
> deleting 
>   
>> any on the website, of course not.  So the discrepancy is 
>>     
> interesting.
>   
>> Sal
>>
>>     
>
> FYI-- I just verified that the Yahoo advanced search isn't very 
> accurate-- I hand-counted my posts from the beginning of Sept.8th  
> until now and the total is 39, not including this one. However, if I 
> use the Yahoo advanced search, I get a total of 34, not including 
> this one. 
>
> So hand counts seem to be the only way to be accurate, for those not 
> receiving emails on FFL. Or whoever keeps tallies can please send an 
> email to Rick. In any case, see you next week.:-)
I found a trick for counting using email and Thunderbird.  First off you 
will need to put all your FFL emails in one folder which probably most 
folks due.  Then select "Mark Folder Read" which I do regularly anyway 
because there are just a lot of topics I'm not interested in.  Then you 
order messages by Sender and select the range for the week.  Right click 
on those highlighted messages and select "Mark as Read" and the messages 
will be marked "Unread" and then total  listed in the lower right hand 
corner of the the Thunderbird window.  That's sort of a lot of work and 
Thunderbird should really anytime you select a group of messages also 
list the number selected.  I'll put in a request for that feature which 
I can tell you as a programmer should not be hard to add.

Reply via email to