--- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 > Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 11:59 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hi, Lurk > > > > Never said that, and do not hold such a stand. I hold the view that > living in a selfsufiscient manner is easier because of fewer > distractions. A blessing really, thats all. > > I know plenty of householders who are a lot more self-sufficient than many > Purusha I have known. In fact, they support themselves and others, whereas > Purusha are dependent on the support of others, and hence, not > self-sufficient.
In one sense, on the financial side of life that is obviously true, and one reason for me to leave Purusha; I got fed up begging. But self-sufisciency applies to other levels of life as well. Many on Purusha might be very, very broke, but collectively, there is less dullness amongst them than amongst housholders. Far less. Cash is not King on Purusha so to speak. No offense, it is simply my oberservation.
