Yes, that helps -- I was onto the webskin/ruleMyRuleName thing but I was still using request.aInvocations in it!
A dangerous amount of knowledge. Derek -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of modius Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 3:39 PM To: farcry-dev Subject: [farcry-dev] Re: Pouplating request.aInvocations: objectid or HTML? On Aug 8, 6:36 am, "Derek Westfall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When populating request.aInvocations I see two approaches: > > 1) Code that uses cfsavecontent, gets the webskin output for the > selected objects and adds HTML to the request.aInvocations array > 2) Code that adds the object ids and display methods to the > request.aInvocations array > > #1 seems to be faster, but I suspect the negative is that changes to a > selected object may not trigger an object webskin cache update as it > would with approach #2? Is that the rub? > > I see #1 being used in the ruleChildLinks rule. Its a historical thing. #3 is probably the most common modern approach to populating the container. #3 Use a webskin a) Create a folder called ./webskin/ruleMyRuleName b) Add an execute.cfm file; no need to think about request.aInvocations See Image Gallery Rule for a short example: http://docs.farcrycms.org:8080/confluence/display/FCDEV40/Image+Gallery+Rule Hope that helps, -- geoff http://www.daemon.com.au/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
