Jake, I am probably over or under thinking this.
I dont think I can use the FC permissions method.. I need to be able to define the access to a file objects individually and not at the "type" level.. For example I may have these types of users.. 1. Anonymous 2. Member (ie. a register user) 3. Sales Rep 4. Service Rep Example.. I have a "usermanual.pdf" dmFile object, and I want it downloadable by say Members, and Service Reps. I have a "planningguide.pdf" that should be viewable by all but Anonymous I have a "brochure.pdf" viewable by all. Obviously the brochure.pdf could have no permissions making it view able by all, but for the others? I dont want to make this harder than it needs to be so if I am not seeing an easy solution please advise, I was considering adding to the category tree something like: AccessControl - Member - Sales Rep - Service Rep Then extending dmFile and dmProfile to have a property "accessControl" The somehow gettting this list into something like session.dmsec.authentication.laccessControlIDs or session.dmprofile.laccessControlIDs Am i overthinking this or not leveraging something? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
