I am not a lawyer this is not legal advice -- I will put this at the top of every post :)
On May 7, 9:54 pm, Matthew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, when you say modify the source, I take it that extensions, plugins, > and projects count in this instance? Also, where would the source need > to be published? I've only got one customer on FarCry Fortress and > they're a health care orgination. It's not yet in production, but it > was never discussed that there would be a licensing fee to use the product. If the client has an application confined to their own organisation, any derivative works owned entirely by them, and they choose not to distribute any code then those modifications are deemed to be private and would not trigger the GPL. If we go the GPL route, then anything that shares a memory space with Core will potentially trigger the GPL license if you choose to distribute the code. However, we are investigating options for a "license exception" to allow webskins and templates to be exempt from the GPL. Plugins are a little bit more tricky. We'd be interested to hear how people would like these to be treated. -- geoff http://www.daemon.com.au/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
