Yes, but based on the current session i want to get userdata, what is a unique value from the user i can use to address that user specifically. The only unique value is the objectid, is that in session also?
On Dec 5, 4:37 am, "Blair McKenzie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > getCurrentUserID refers to data in the session scope. > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Marco van den Oever < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What i don't understand is how you can be sure to select unique user > > data through: application.security.getCurrentUserID() if you can > > submit users with the same id without getting a duplicate value error > > or whatsoever. > > > Of course it can be i don't know the path yet through the jungle of > > user management structures.... > > > On Dec 3, 10:30 pm, Marco van den Oever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Perfect, i now have a array of user names, you know of any existing > > > function that will get user info from dmProfile by name? Also the > > > names retrieved are without the _CLIENTUD, so i guess that needs to be > > > manually added like: > > > > <cfset setusername = departmentuser & "_CLIENTUD"> > > > > to be able to get the email addresses from dmProfile where the userid > > > is with the addition of _CLIENTUD > > > > Thanks > > > > On Dec 3, 4:47 pm, "Tomek Kott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I don't quite get your specific situation, but I know there is a > > function in > > > > farcryud.cfc (or whatever the default farcry UD is called) that is > > > > essentially a 'get users who are in group X' function. > > > > Just checked, its farcry/core/packages/security/farcryud.cfc : > > > > getGroupUsers(). > > > > > Additionally, take a look at getProfile as a way of getting the email > > > > address from a username. I don't know if that function requires the > > > > _CLIENTUD part or not. I think it simply goes through all the UD's > > until it > > > > finds the username... but check the code out. > > > > > Tomek > > > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Marco van den Oever < > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I have a ticket type which allows users to create tickets, in there > > > > > they can select a department through a dropdown of the Farcry groups, > > > > > i did this as i want to use existing structure as much as possible. > > > > > > Although these are groups used for permissions, why not use it again? > > > > > Is this advisable to do so? > > > > > > Now, when a user creates a ticket the createdby field gets a nice (in > > > > > this case) "farcry". If i want to collect the email address for this > > > > > person i need to address the table dmprofile. > > > > > > So the type createdby value: "farcry" needs to match the userName > > > > > field in table dmprofile: farcry_CLIENTUD > > > > > > Now i match the user by using: > > > > > > <cfset setusername = stTicket.createdby & "_CLIENTUD"> > > > > > > and selecting from table dmprofile with: > > > > > > <cfset stprops.userName = setusername /> > > > > > > Is that the way to do so? > > > > > > Then i come to the point that based on the chosen department for the > > > > > ticket (through the dropdown of the Farcry groups) i want to select > > > > > the users from dmProfile that have this department (actually Farcry > > > > > group) assigned. > > > > > > So for that of course you can think of a construction, but my > > question > > > > > is, is this the way to do so? > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > > On Dec 2, 6:29 pm, Marco van den Oever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Thanks both, that will do it :) > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 3:57 am, "Blair McKenzie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > application.security.getCurrentUserID() returns the current > > userid or > > > > > an > > > > > > > empty string for no logged in user. > > > > > > > > application.security.isLoggedIn() returns true / false > > > > > > > > Blair > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Tomek Kott <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > i think there is a application.security.isLogged() function (or > > > > > something > > > > > > > > similar to it, check the dmSecurity / security.cfc. I would > > probably > > > > > say to > > > > > > > > use that in case the session variable ever gets updated to > > something > > > > > > > > different or userid gets renamed. > > > > > > > > Otherwise I would say you're fine as long as you're checking > > that > > > > > after > > > > > > > > users have signed in. > > > > > > > > > Tomek > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Marco van den Oever < > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> What is the official way to get the logged in user data? > > > > > > > > >> For instance now i use session.dmsec.AUTHENTICATION.userid to > > get > > > > > the > > > > > > > >> logged in userid, i have chosen this because i am afraid that > > if the > > > > > > > >> profile isn't filled in, the code will not work. > > > > > > > > >> How do you do it? And should you always point out to users > > they HAVE > > > > > > > >> to fill in the profile or else the plugin etc doesn't work, or > > is it > > > > > > > >> best to build in some checking that will throw a request to > > first > > > > > fill > > > > > > > >> in the profile. > > > > > > > > >> Thank you --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
