For most of our clients the live/draft workflow is sufficient. In those cases archives just take up space.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Michael Sharman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Quick question on this one, why would anybody not be preserving the > dmArchive table to do rollbacks? This would seem like a very important > function especially in a corporate multi-user environment. > > Is it just that the clients you're working on don't ever need it? And > just to confirm, this is the only way to perform a rollback correct? > > Thanks > > On Jun 15, 9:37 am, Blair McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you aren't using the archive table for roll-back functionality (and I > > don't know anyone who is) then you can clear it out as often as you need > to. > > > > Blair > > > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Chris Roth <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > My DB is getting overgrown, and it looks like the dmarchive table is > > > the biggest user. > > > > > There is a very old post: > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev/#16browse_thread/thread/ccf.. > .<http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev/browse_thread/thread/ccfc92.. > .> > > > > > I want to make sure that (5.1.1) I can purge some older date from this > > > table, and run fixrefobjects and be oki doki. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: [email protected] To unsubscribe, email: [email protected] For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
