What i do notice is when you start without the optional field, then activate it by checking selectbox, the validation "this is a required field" is not showing while click submit and fill in no value, when i start with checkbox selected, so also the field, then it works.
Is there something i need to change or is this an improvement feature i should add? On Jun 22, 8:03 pm, Marco van den Oever <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tomek it works now, awesome :) > > On Jun 22, 3:37 pm, Tomek Kott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Marco, > > > Viewing over your code, and if you updated everything (I think FC5.1 now > > caches the functions, so you need to update after changing them), then it > > should work. If it doesn't work, then my guess is that the problem lies in > > ftSeq. > > > To debug, maybe try switching the order of the ftSeq just for a test? > > > Tomek > > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Marco van den Oever < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Tomek, i replied on: > > > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example > > > > Just to be sure you know, i don't see notifications on comments... > > > > On Jun 5, 5:09 pm, Marco van den Oever <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > Awesome Tomek, gonna play with it asap :) > > > > > On Jun 5, 4:57 pm, Tomek Kott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > already found a problem when no ftDefault value is defined for the > > > boolean. > > > > > Updated code (including javascript to get rid of the label showing up > > > as > > > > > well) is here: > > > > > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example > > > > > > Tomek > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Tomek Kott <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/ftWatch+Example > > > > > > > quick editing job, feel free to correct / expand / etc. > > > > > > > Tomek > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Tomek Kott <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> Hi All, > > > > > > >> I wanted to play around with ftWatch and see what I could do with > > > the > > > > > >> displays and such, and extending the two formtools (numeric, > > > > > >> string) > > > was > > > > > >> quite instructive. I thought it would be useful to post it here > > > > > >> (and > > > > > >> eventually on wiki), since its an easy example of checking whether > > > > > >> a > > > boolean > > > > > >> field is being watched, and if so, displaying the input or not > > > depending on > > > > > >> the boolean value: > > > > > > >> <cfif structkeyexists(arguments.stMetadata,"ftWatch") and > > > > > >> len(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch) > > > > > >> AND > > > > structkeyexists(arguments.stObject,"#listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)#") > > > > > > >> AND > > > > isValid("boolean",arguments.stObject[listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)]) > > > > > > >> AND NOT > > > > > >> arguments.stObject[listfirst(arguments.stMetadata.ftWatch)] > > > > > > >> <cfset html=""/> > > > > > >> <cfelse> > > > > > >> <cfset html = > > > super.edit(argumentCollection="#arguments#") /> > > > > > >> </cfif> > > > > > > >> And similar for display function. > > > > > > >> Now if only I could get rid of the label for that as well...any > > > ideas on > > > > > >> that? > > > > > > >> Tomek > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: [email protected] To unsubscribe, email: [email protected] For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
