Thanks Blair.. I'll be standing by for the fix.
On Nov 17, 2:43 pm, Blair McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote: > It's a willy one, and I'm trying to work out a fix for it now. It's > happening because of the way the cache for archived FUs are generated. > Farcry get's the default FU, which automatically caches a generated URL > struct, which (among other things) checks the default FU. I'll let you guys > know when I figure out the fix. I don't know why rebuild FUs works, maybe it > removes archived FUs or just clears up some catch-22. > > Blair > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Chris Roth <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yikes. > > > The branch I am having a problem with is the largest branch of our > > site, and have numerous FUs that have been built beyond the system > > generated ones. > > > Not sure how "rebuild fus" works but I am scared to run it. > > > I dont understand why I am havinf a problem with just this one branch. > > > On Nov 17, 1:16 pm, PhillipR <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Resolved. > > > - I delete the content of the farFU table > > > - ?updateapp= with the new core. > > > - rebuilt the FU's > > > -- > > You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google > > group. > > To post, email: [email protected] > > To unsubscribe, email: > > [email protected]<farcry-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > For more options:http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev > > -------------------------------- > > Follow us on Twitter:http://twitter.com/farcry- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: [email protected] To unsubscribe, email: [email protected] For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
