ok... looks like it is, in fact working. Just that the 5.1.11 version of datetime.cfc does not check whether to display the date or not...
problem fixed Tomek On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Tomek Kott <[email protected]> wrote: > ok, part of the problem was a badly used if statement on my part. however, > the question for me still remains when using datetime. > > If I DO NOT want a date associated, and I unclick the checkbox for that > date. I still get some default time associated with things ( specifically > now() ) even though I want BLANK (or at least the farcry false blank in 2210 > whatever). As it is now, I can't set it to blank even! > > Any help with this part of things? > > Tomek > > > On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Tomek Kott <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> I'm having a hard time getting something to work right (and it was working >> correctly before, and before anyone asks, it was a late night patch up job >> and so I can't be sure when it was changed in the code base, so no returning >> back for me). >> >> I have a datetime formtool that takes in a normal date. I can dump the >> structure that the validate function returns, and it is the correct one. By >> the time it gets to the setData function of the type, and I dump the >> stProperties that enters, that field is now empty. >> >> *Where could this be occurring between validation and setting? * >> >> That's what has me stumped. By now I've tried every combination of >> ftValidation, types, etc. that I can think of, and still nothing. I reload >> the type after each change. >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> TIA >> >> Tomek >> > > -- You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: [email protected] To unsubscribe, email: [email protected] For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
