Thanks, I'll have a read! I assume nothing's changed in FC 6... On Oct 6, 8:27 am, Blair McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote: > For extending object specific permissions to your own > types:https://farcry.jira.com/wiki/display/FCDEV50/Object+specific+permissions > > Blair > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Scott Mebberson > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Hey Geoff, > > > Thanks for that. With the new setup, where would the best place to put > > that view controller logic? I'm guessing an overridden method in my > > custom object, which extends farcry.core.packages.types.types. > > > I checked out getDisplay but that doesn't seem to be executed. So I'm > > thinking getView would be the place to put it? > > > cheers, > > Scott. > > > On Oct 5, 9:48 pm, modius <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You'd only be looking at farBarnacle if you were looking at tree-based > > > content types that you wanted to bind to the inheritance model on the > > > tree. Otherwise you might as well just look at the ownership id of the > > > individual content instance -- and that would be pretty > > > straightforward. > > > > You can list objects that match the same ownership id and also put a > > > check on the edit handler to block users who don't have a matching > > > ownership id. > > > > Hope that helps, > > > > --geoffhttp://www.daemon.com.au/ > > > > On Oct 5, 10:25 pm, Scott Mebberson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I've been looking into the new security stuff in application.security. > > > > I've been trying to work out how to secure an object, specific to user > > > > and permission. For example, I'd like userA to have the ObjectView > > > > permission for a particular object, but I don't want userB to have the > > > > ObjectView permission for the same object. > > > > > It looks like application.security.checkPermission is what I'm looking > > > > for, but I don't want to secure based on roles alone, but be as > > > > specific as the user itself. > > > > > I get the feeling this isn't possible? Any ideas on what the best way > > > > to approach the above is? > > > > > I'm creating a custom editing interface, and this stuff has nothing to > > > > do with formtools or FarCry admin. I basically want to secure the > > > > editing interface for objects, such that only the owner can view the > > > > editing interface for the objects they own. Is there a way to > > > > elegantly achieve what I want using the ownedby property of > > > > farBarnacle? > > > -- > > You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google > > group. > > To post, email: [email protected] > > To unsubscribe, email: > > [email protected]<farcry-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegrou > > ps.com> > > For more options:http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev > > -------------------------------- > > Follow us on Twitter:http://twitter.com/farcry
-- You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: [email protected] To unsubscribe, email: [email protected] For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
