it is still a good idea to fully scope your variables ;-)

On 2 December 2011 12:04, tHeSmUrF <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for the response Blair.  It turned out to be a typo I made that
> I didn't spot until now.
>
> Cheers
> Mark
>
> On Dec 2, 2:52 pm, Blair McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Try looking in arguments.stParam
> >
> > Blair
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 2:48 PM, tHeSmUrF <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > LOL.  I posted here rather than emailing you because I didn't want to
> > > bother you.  I'm trying to get this done so that we can be on FC6
> > > before you come to Dubbo in January.
> >
> > > I had tried setting stParam and passing it to the view but that also
> > > didn't work.
> >
> > > This is the exact line from /displayPageSingle.cfm
> >
> > > <skin:view objectid="#stobj.objectid#" typename="#stobj.typename#"
> > > template="displayHeaderStandard" layoutclass="type-c" />
> >
> > > Then in displayHeaderStandard I've got it dumping attributes, stObj
> > > even URL and can't see any sign of layoutclass.  Even tried dumping
> > > stParam just in case, but it doesn't exist.
> >
> > > I did notice when following the execution path that getview from
> > > fourq.cfc passes stparam to the runView function but runView doesn't
> > > do anything with stParam.....
> >
> > > Sorry should have noted before that I'm testing with FarCry 6.1
> > > milestone.
> >
> > > Cheers
> > > Mark
> >
> > > On Dec 2, 2:16 pm, Justin Carter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Yep you're right, that is how it should work and we do this all the
> time.
> > > > The alternative is passing in a struct using the stParam attribute -
> > > which
> > > > that tag already seems to have. I'm not aware of there being any
> > > conflicts
> > > > though, I assumed the stParam struct would be used and then any
> > > individual
> > > > attributes would overwrite stParam.
> >
> > > > You could try setting the layout class in the struct before the
> skin:view
> > > > tag is called:
> >
> > > > <cfset stParam.layoutclass = "type-c">
> >
> > > > Alternatively, if you're not actually populating stParam then just
> remove
> > > > it. It really should work both ways though...
> >
> > > > cheers,
> > > > Justin
> >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 2:05 PM, tHeSmUrF <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> >
> > > > > In the process again of preparing our FC4 sites for an upgrade to
> > > > > FC6.1 and I’m hitting an issue with webskins.  Can someone tell me
> how
> > > > > I pass additional parameters to the webskins?
> >
> > > > > On the FC4 sites I have a template in dmInclude of
> > > > > displayPageTypeA.cfm.  This skin would call in the header (project/
> > > > > webskin/includes/header.cfm) using cfmodule and at the same type
> pass
> > > > > a couple of variables (e.g. layoutclass).  The header.cfm file
> would
> > > > > check for the variables and process accordingly.
> >
> > > > > With FC6 I have a similar template in dmInclude called
> > > > > displayPageSingle.cfm. This uses <skin:view etc.> to load the
> /project/
> > > > > webskin/types/displayHeaderStandard webskin.
> >
> > > > > I thought that changing the line in displayPageSingle:
> >
> > > > > <skin:view stParam="#stParam#" objectid="#stobj.objectid#"
> > > > > typename="#stobj.typename#" template="displayHeaderStandard">
> >
> > > > > to
> >
> > > > > <skin:view stParam="#stParam#" objectid="#stobj.objectid#"
> > > > > typename="#stobj.typename#" template="displayHeaderStandard"
> > > > > layoutclass=”type-c”>
> >
> > > > > Would cause \core\tags\webskin\view.cfm to add the additional
> > > > > “layoutclass” to the stParam structure (around line 38 of
> view.cfm) so
> > > > > that layoutclass would be available to displayHeaderStandard but
> this
> > > > > doesn’t seem to be true.  Is this how it should work? If not, how
> do I
> > > > > pass variables around the webskins?
> >
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > > Mark
> >
> > > > > --
> > > > > You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev"
> Google
> > > > > group.
> > > > > To post, email: [email protected]
> > > > > To unsubscribe, email: [email protected]
> > > > > For more options:http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
> > > > > --------------------------------
> > > > > Follow us on Twitter:http://twitter.com/farcry-Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google
> > > group.
> > > To post, email: [email protected]
> > > To unsubscribe, email: [email protected]
> > > For more options:http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
> > > --------------------------------
> > > Follow us on Twitter:http://twitter.com/farcry- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google
> group.
> To post, email: [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, email: [email protected]
> For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
> --------------------------------
> Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
>



-- 

*AJ Mercer*
<webonix:net strength="Industrial" /> <http://webonix.net> | <webonix:org
community="Open" /> <http://webonix.org>
http://twitter.com/webonix
Railo Community Manager <http://www.getrailo.org/index.cfm/community/team/>

-- 
You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group.
To post, email: [email protected]
To unsubscribe, email: [email protected]
For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
--------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry

Reply via email to