>> To allow them to be defaulted in the config (rather than extending >> richtext.cfc), and also overridable in each formtool property, I think we'd >> need to do some smarter splitting/parsing of the JS config, or break those >> particular properties out into separate fields in the config (probably the >> better option).
Any thoughts on doing the second option (separate fields in the config)? It's not the worst thing in the world to have to extend richtext.cfc on every site, but it just seems counterproductive since most people will likely be having to do it. Jeff -- You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: [email protected] To unsubscribe, email: [email protected] For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
