Yep. Same thing for your own types too.

Next time you go into Admin -> COAPI and select types or rules, farCry
will check for CFCs and if find any for tables that don't exisits gives
you the option to deploy it.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kola
Oyedeji
Sent: Wednesday, 26 May 2004 21:29 PM
To: FarCry Developers
Subject: [farcry-dev] Re: FW: How to delete a rule

Yikes! I was hoping you wouldn't say that! So I guess I can just go into
the database and drop the table?

Kola

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-farcry-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Lucas
>> Sent: 26 May 2004 14:18
>> To: FarCry Developers
>> Subject: [farcry-dev] Re: FW: How to delete a rule
>> 
>> Kola Oyedeji spoke the following wise words on 26/05/2004 11:10 PM
EST:
>> > How do I actually delete/remove a rule? I've renamed/removed the
>> > physical cfc file name but under the COAPI, Rule Classes tab it is
>> still being
>> > shown as deployed. I have also tried appending updateApp=1 to the
url
>> > and clicking on "refresh app scope" in design mode on the floating
>> panel
>> > but this rule just wont die!!
>> 
>> AFAIK there's no elegant way of removing a rule.
>> 
>> You may also need to remove the rule's table from the DB.
>> 
>> -- tim
>> 
>> ---
>> You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-farcry-dev-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia
>> http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004



---
You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia
http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004



---
You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia
http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004

Reply via email to