|
Hi Andrew, That's how I've setup the images for our dmHTML objects. So far it's been working fine and the file upload code was greatly simplified. I thought I would just limit to dmHTML for now to see how it works, but so far so good. --Kyle Kyle
Singer Andrew Mercer wrote: ---Would it be a good idea to name image and files on the server by their object ID rather that it's upload file name?This would simplify naming conflicts and files been overwritten; and maybe even allow for file and image versioning. All file and images are uploaded to a common folder on the server, so it is currently possible that two articles may upload different images with the same file name. Rather than making the user have to rename their file (if they can work ou the error message) and try again, just give the file the object id as a name. The title is used to identify it to the user - the default could be the client file name if they do not enter anything?? Is this a good idea? Or is there some thinking behind the current solution? --- You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ |
