Wondering what would be so unique about some navigation that would mean you would have to go direct to the tables?
All of the API functions are able to return "everything" that is in the tables. And you can literally get a full dump of the data if you go from a high node (like root) and ask for all levels. I have done that before just to find out how it all hangs together. I have custom nav's built that add stuff to what is already there (like desktop's, admin only items, etc. that don't actually appear in the tree at all) as well as combining several branches from different nav roots. All without going direct to the database. I haven't been able to think of anything that you couldn't do with the API that is there. That is not to say that I dont do things that could be better served by extending the API - but I am not convinced that my requirements are "common" enough to warrant asking for changes. And it's CFMX - so I can just inherit the Tree class and add my few bits on if I really want to. Regards, Gary On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:02:40 +0100, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah there is this but what if you have something so unique that you cant > get around direct table access? > --- You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
