what version did this come in? a quick search of b211 found 19 hits for #application.packagepath#.security
also 19 hits in b220 should I just do a search and relace? On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 22:03:20 +0800, Andrew Mercer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 3) > 30 seconds later I see I will need to mod the core files. > > maybe David's code should make it to the core files? > > > > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:51:24 +0800, Andrew Mercer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > 1) > > If I was to set the Security Package Path, does that mean I would have > > to have an extended CFC for each of the CFCs in the farcry security > > directory? > > > > I know it is no big deal, just extend the CFC and only create > > functions for things that you want to change. > > > > 2) > > Does this mean that any security checks within farCry will use my CFCs? > > > > Currently I have my own login.cfm which calls my CFC - with hardcoded path. > > So I am guessing I would still have my login.cfm, but I should use the > > Security Package Path setting in the APPLICATION variable? > > > > 3) > > Not really sure what the benefit is?? > > > > Currently, I am not modifing the core files. > > > > On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:32:23 -0800, Tom Cornilliac > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yup! The problem is in "jrun.security.NTAuth". If the string of group > > > names is too long then it doesn't return. I'm not sure what the > > > cut-off is. MM is aware of the problem but they have yet to fix it > > > ;-( > > > > > > David Ross has a really cool CFC on his Blog that will handle nested > > > groups in AD via LDAP. You can find the info here: > > > > > > http://www.d-ross.org/index.cfm?objectid=9C65EEF0-508B-E116-6F30CA79F5BFDE07 > > > > > > Also, if your going to tweak with Farcry security (and you are) then > > > you should consider changing the Security Package Path in "[your app > > > name]\config\_serverSpecificVars.cfm" so that it points to your App. > > > This allows you to extend/overwrite the core security methods without > > > making any core changes :) > > > > > > HTH, > > > > > > ~tom > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:49:24 +0800, Andrew Mercer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > I have a client site that is using the COM that is packaged with > > > > farcry (ntAdmin.dll) to hook into Active Directory. For 300 users it > > > > is working fine, however, there are a handfull of users who have valid > > > > and active accounts that are getting 'false' returned from get user > > > > groups; where everyone else get a list of groups returned. > > > > > > > > I have created a test script using CFLDAP and it is able to retrieve > > > > all the groups for the users in question. > > > > > > > > Has anyone encountered this before? > > > > Any ideas of where to start looking? > > > > > > > > Is there a CFLDAP solution out there that anyone is prepared to share > > > > with the community? > > > > > > > > --- > > > > You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ > > > --- You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
