[farcry-dev] Re: nested_tree_objects table vs dmNavigation table

[Geoff Bowers]

Sounds like the Delete option for branches is not correctly calling the 
super.delete() method in types.cfc -- if this is the case it's 
definitely a bug.

-- geoff
http://www.daemon.com.au/
Gavin Cooney wrote:
Any ideas about this? Could it point to a bug with deleting in the core? 

Would there be a safe way of deleting the spare records? Delete all
navs not in nested_tree_objects and then delete all dmHTMLs with
parents not in dmNavigation?
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:35:18 +1100, Gavin Cooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone tell me why i have 195 records in my nested_tree_objects
table and about 1400 in my dmNavigation table?
Also there's about 1700 records in the dmHtml table. I mostly have one
dmHTML object under every nav- altho i do have some table of contents
pages.
Cheers
Gav
---
You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/