Hi,

It seems to me that these are all different shapes of one letter 
<hamza>. But <heh+hamza above) is a mixture of two letters: <heh> and a 
transformed <yeh>. It is not even a ligature, because it is not supposed 
to be handled by font to write <heh+hamza above> instead of <heh and yeh>.

Best
-khanban-

Abi Lover wrote:

> I don' agree with Khanban's reasons for not using the letter form <heh 
> + hamzeh above>. The same reasons could be given for not using <vav + 
> hamzeh above>. For example, {mas'ul} could also be written as {mas 
> ool} (with alef instead of hamzeh), and {so'a^l} could also be written 
> as {so aal} (with alef-madd instead of hamzeh); and it is quite 
> possible that in the distant future people will start writing them 
> that way. However, if it is true that the Unicode standard encodes 
> this shape in a way that is not compatible with Farsi, then that would 
> be a justifiable reason for not adopting it in the standard. But in 
> that case, it should be explained in the standard why it cannot be 
> adopted, and it should also be explained (especially for the benefit 
> of software developers for whom Farsi is not the native language) that 
> this shape is commonly used in Farsi, and that there is nothing to 
> stop font dev! elopers and application developers from supporting this 
> shape as a ligature, provided that it is properly implemented so that 
> it can be correctly parsed into its appropriate Unicode equivalents.
>  
> I have also noticed that on the latest ISRI standard for a Farsi 
> keyboard layout, this shape is not supported either. It supports <vav 
> + hamzeh above>, and even supports some obscure Arabic characters 
> which are hardly ever used in Farsi, such as the <Arabic round T>, and 
> <Arabic yeh with two dots below>, but not <heh + hamzeh above>, which 
> is extensively used in farsi. There is no justification for this. The 
> purpose of such standards should not be to tell people how to write 
> Farsi. People decide how to write Farsi. The standard should encode 
> and standardize what people write. A keyboard layout is not dependent 
> on Unicode encodings. Since this letter form is used extensively in 
> Farsi, it should be possible to enter it with a single stroke of the 
> keyboard, as is the case with <vav + hamzeh above>, instead of having 
> to type two key strokes to write it; and font and software d! 
> evelopers should be guided to support it as a ligature in their fonts 
> and applications.
>  
> Abi
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here 
> <http://g.msn.com/1HM305301/44>
> _______________________________________________ FarsiWeb mailing list 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> http://lists.sharif.edu/mailman/listinfo/farsiweb 


-- 
________________________________________________________________

|| ||||  Ali Asghar Khanban
|| ||    Research Associate in Department of Computing
|||||||  Imperial College of Sci, Tech & Med, London SW7 2BZ, UK
||       Tel +44 (20) 7594 8241           Fax: +1 (509) 694 0599
|||||||  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~khanban
________________________________________________________________



_______________________________________________
FarsiWeb mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sharif.edu/mailman/listinfo/farsiweb

Reply via email to