On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, C Bobroff wrote:
> > They *could* be instructed. Google is very bad in linguistics, specially
> > when considering Persian.
> Oh? So they ARE supposed to be equal and the problem is with Google and
> not with those tables. I'm greatly relieved!
> Next question: Why hasn't Google been instructed? How can we give it a
> refresher course in linguistics?
They don't have computational linguistics for any language other
than English AFAIK. So, I do not recommend trying that.
> > Really, you'd better use both :((
> You are cruel!
which is going to study after finishing this mail.
FarsiWeb mailing list