Hi, Andreas, Thanks for bring up this issue. Our intent is to support queries on in-memory data tables. Obviously, we have not done enough testing on this feature. I will look into adding a bit more testing for this case. Please let us know if you have something simple that we can test with.
John On 4/8/2010 11:00 AM, Andreas Streichardt wrote: > Hi, > > i am using the table::select interface to create a table. This works like a > charm. However when i want to do a subsequent select on this (in memory) table > this doesn't work. > > This might be related to the problem that Teryl is currently facing. However i > don't need a persistent table in my case (on the other hand i could live with > that solution for now). > > I tracked it down to ibis::query::doEvaluate, where > > if (mask.cnt() == 0) > > is true and thus i don't get a result. > > Background: > > I have a very large data set. However i need to perform many queries on a > specific (non constant - otherwise i would have written the subset to disc) > subset of this data set. Querying the whole data set over and over again with > a constant base is of course slower. > > Is there a way to do that? > > Kind regards, > > Andreas Streichardt > _______________________________________________ > FastBit-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://hpcrdm.lbl.gov/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fastbit-users _______________________________________________ FastBit-users mailing list [email protected] https://hpcrdm.lbl.gov/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fastbit-users
