Hi John, I've just compiled the lastest version from the SVN, generated some blobs and dumped the table. So far so good. I think I understand the format for blobs, which is important for me since I'm generating the partitions myself (because using fastbit interface was somewhat slower). I'll try to modify my code to store BLOBs as well, then I'll play with it some more. I'll let you know how it goes.
Thanks, Petr On 13 February 2013 15:50, K. John Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Petr, > > There support for BLOB as a column type, but the support is in pieces. > For example, the program examples/setqgen.cpp can write out BLOBs and > we have exercised the operations involving reading and writing of > BLOBs. The next thing needed would be a reasonable test case (or a > set of tests) to exercise the functions and reveal the missing pieces. > Would you be able to provide something for testing of BLOBs? > > John > > > On 2/13/13 5:31 AM, Petr Velan wrote: >> Hi John, >> >> A lot of work has been done on FastBit since I last updated my version >> of the library. I was wondering, whether there is any change regarding >> the BLOBs. I would like to store binary data in a separate column and >> access it using the cursor class. >> >> I'd be also interested in a reorder feature that would work with >> strings and BLOBs. I do not need to sort by such values, but I need >> them reordered as well to ensure the consistency of the data. >> >> Thank you for all the work you have put into this great framework! >> >> Best Regards, >> Petr >> _______________________________________________ >> FastBit-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://hpcrdm.lbl.gov/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fastbit-users >> _______________________________________________ FastBit-users mailing list [email protected] https://hpcrdm.lbl.gov/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fastbit-users
