Right. Does make application side math a bit more complex. But thanks for the idea.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Justin Swanhart <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > The traditional way would to be to store the high/low 64 bits into two 64 > bit ints, or to use four 32 bit ints. That will make math more complex for > ranges but it is workable, might need some app-side math too. John may be > able to provide other solutions. > > --Justin > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Ian Pye <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> All, >> >> I'm looking for a way to store IPv6 addresses in fastbit. The catch is >> that they are 128 bits wide. I could use a blob type, but then nice >> operations like > and < don't work. I'm wondering if anyone has done >> this, and if so what techniques worked. >> >> Best, >> >> Ian >> _______________________________________________ >> FastBit-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://hpcrdm.lbl.gov/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fastbit-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > FastBit-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://hpcrdm.lbl.gov/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fastbit-users > _______________________________________________ FastBit-users mailing list [email protected] https://hpcrdm.lbl.gov/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fastbit-users
