Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mar 15, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >> >>> One of the possible solutions to this problem is that expand the size >>> of "start" and "end" to "unsigned long long". But whole of the PCI and >>> driver code has been written assuming start and end to be unsigned long >>> and compiler starts throwing warnings. >> >> >> please use dma_addr_t then instead of unsigned long long >> >> this is the right size on all platforms afaik (could a ppc64 person >> verify this?> ;) > > Actually we really just want "start" and "end" to be u64 on all platforms. > Linus was ok with this change but no one has gone through and fixed > everything > that would be required for it.
Since it is faster to ask :) How is it that other pieces of code have problems? Warnings or something nasty? Eric
_______________________________________________ fastboot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot
