On Tuesday 02 May 2006 21:16, Don Zickus wrote: > I have modified the priority to be the highest on the die chain as per the > discussion. For some reason I misread the code originally and thought > zero was the higher priority. > > I also corrected a vector number for send_IPI_allbutself(). Originally I > posted DIE_NMI_IPI but then later realized that wasn't the vector number > the function was looking for. Surprisingly it passed my tests??
Every time the NMI bit is set in the APIC the event ends up at the NMI vector. Can you please resend the patch with: - Full description suitable as a changelog - Not as an attachment - Signed-off lines Thanks, -Andi
_______________________________________________ fastboot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot
