On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:37:49 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > This patch removes the foolish assumption that SMP implied local > apics. That assumption is not-true on the Voyager subarch. This > makes that dependency explicit, and allows the code to build.
Doesn't only a small portion of the code in question rely on CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC? Is just a workaround until proper voager support materialises? > What gets disabled is just an optimization to get better crash > dumps so the support should work if there is a kernel that will > initialization on the voyager subarch under those harsh conditions. By that do you mean, a crash kernel that is able to boot even though the non-crashing CPUs have not been shutdown? > Hopefully we can figure out how to initialize apics in init_IRQ > and remove the need to disable io_apics and this dependency. That does sound nice. Do you have any ideas on how that could be made to happen? > Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > arch/i386/kernel/crash.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/crash.c b/arch/i386/kernel/crash.c > index f10da80..67d297d 100644 > --- a/arch/i386/kernel/crash.c > +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/crash.c > @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static void crash_save_self(struct pt_re > crash_save_this_cpu(regs, cpu); > } > > -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC) > static atomic_t waiting_for_crash_ipi; > > static int crash_nmi_callback(struct notifier_block *self, -- Horms H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/ _______________________________________________ fastboot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot
