>
> Stupid questions:
> - Why do we still have a linux/config.h if it is totally redundant.
> - Why don't we have at least a #warning in linux/config.h that would
> tell us not to include it.
> - Why do we still have about 200 includes of linux/config.h in the
> kernel tree?
>
> I would much rather have a compile error, or at least a compile
> warning rather than needed a code review to notice this error.
In progress. As part of the ongoing header cleanup all include
<config.h> are being removed and a warning is included in config.h.
When the change was done I did not want to spew out thousands of warning
for a simple thing like this.
Sam
_______________________________________________
fastboot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot
