On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 09:25:13AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 12:33:30PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > I think that autogen.sh is a fiamilar to many develipers
> > as a way way to bootstrap source trees. So this might make
> > bootstraping the kexec-tools tree easier for some.
> >     
> 
> Hi Simon,
> 
> Won't existing following Makefile targets take caer of building
> configure and then running ./configure.
> 
> Makefile.conf: Makefile.conf.in configure
>         /bin/sh ./configure
> 
> configure: configure.ac
>         autoconf
>         $(RM) -rf autom4te.cache
> 
> 
> If yes, then we don't have to introduce autogen.sh at all and every
> thing can be controlled by make.

I'm not convinced that those targets work right now,
mainly because Makefile expects Makefile.conf to exist.
But you are right that this kind of approch is more appealing
than intorducing autogen.sh. I'll see about fixing it up.

-- 
Horms
  H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
  W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/

_______________________________________________
fastboot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot

Reply via email to