On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 10:41:51AM +0930, Michael Neuling wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:18:39AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote: > > > So, like, the other day Vivek Goyal mumbled: > > > > > > > > Now with distros adopting kexce-tools, I am in for maintaining the > > > > backwa > rd > > > > compatibility as far as possible. Putting a note in the code is good > > > > that > > > > down the line, get rid of this code. > > > > > > Perhaps scheduling it as an entry in > > > > > > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > > > > > > just so people (distros) can plan around it? > > > > Perfect. In kexec-tools it can go in doc/feature-removal-schedule.txt. > > It doesn't really need to go in the kernel source as the kernel has > already changed and besides, we were adding a feature to the kernel, not > removing one. > > At this stage, it's just a kexec tools feature removal.
If someone wants to make a patch for kexec-tools I'm happy to put it into kexec-tools-testing. Though I am a little dubious about the possibilities of vendors taking any notice of it. -- Horms H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/ _______________________________________________ fastboot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot
