On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 09:09:46AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:09:08 -0400 > Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > o Relocation patches for i386, moved the symbols in vmlinux.lds.S inside > > sections so that these symbols become section relative and are no more > > absolute. If these symbols become absolute, its bad as they are not > > relocated if kernel is not loaded at the address it has been compiled > > for. > > > > o Ironically, just moving the symbols inside the section does not > > gurantee that symbols inside will not become absolute. Recent > > versions of linkers, do some optimization, and if section size is > > zero, it gets rid of the section and makes any defined symbol as absolute. > > > > o This leads to a failure while second kernel is booting. > > arch/i386/alternative.c frees any pages present between __smp_alt_begin > > and __smp_alt_end. In my case size of section .smp_altinstructions is > > zero and symbol __smpt_alt_begin becomes absolute and is not relocated > > and system crashes while it is trying to free the memory starting > > from __smp_alt_begin. > > > > o This issue is being fixed by the linker guys and they are making sure > > that linker does not get rid of an empty section if there is any > > section relative symbol defined in it. But we need to fix it at > > kernel level too so that people using the linker version without fix, > > are not affected. > > > > o One of the possible solutions is that force the section size to be > > non zero to make sure these symbols don't become absolute. This > > patch implements that. > > Would it be reasonable to omit this patch and require that the small number > of people who want to build relocatable kernels install binutils > 2.17.50.0.5 or later?
I think that's a reasonable thing to do for now. Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ fastboot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot
