Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> Ugh.  I just tested this with a grub 0.97-5 from what I assume is a
> standard FC5 install (I haven't touched it) and the kernel boots.
> I only have a 64bit user space on that machine so init doesn't
> start but I get the rest of the kernel messages.
> 
> There were several testers working at redhat so a pure redhat
> incompatibility would be a surprise.
> 
> I don't think the formula is a simple grub+bzImage == death.
> 
> There is something more subtle going on here.  
> 
> I'm not certain where to start looking.  Andrew it might help if we
> could get the dying binary just in case some weird compile or
> processing problem caused insanely unlikely things like the multiboot
> binary to show up in your grub install.  I don't think that is it,
> but it should allow us to rule out that possibility.
> 

I would try running it in a more memory-constrained environment.

        -hpa
_______________________________________________
fastboot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot

Reply via email to