"Smith, Stan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have been wrestling with this same "Invalid memory segment 0x92000 - > 95000" error
This one is probably implementation foolishness, (trying to putt something at 0x90000 when it is not available. Can you post /proc/iomem I suspect you will find something in that range. > Debug so far has the bzImage segment[0].bufsz being 10 bytes less than > what the same code compiled/running on x86(i686) reports. bzImage > segment[1].bufsz is 64 bytes greater than what x86 reports. > Initially suspected uClibc problem, when uClibc was replaced with GNU > libc, same failure? > > Using native built (x86_64) kexec-tools-1.101, 2.6.18 kernel, REL4.u4 > the problem does not occur? Odd. It is clearly time for a little more maintenance here. Eric _______________________________________________ fastboot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot
