On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 09:47:10AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:24:41 +0100 Thomas Meyer wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > What kind of problem is this: > > 1.) the one that should be fixed, but also can be ignored or > > 2.) the one that have to be fixed and ignorance is a bad idea? > > > > Is this with CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y? > There were some patches posted to address section mismatches > with that config option. I suppose that they will be in the > next -mm release (?), so this needs to be retested with > those patches applied. >
Hi Randy, I have posted some patches. But there are lots of warnings and I am still working through the rest. Already posted patches are available in rc2-mm1. Any help from respective subsystem maintainers is appreciated. :-) These problems are already present. CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y just makes them visible to MODPOST as relocatation information is retained in vmlinux if CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y. Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ fastboot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot
