On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:17:38PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > On 12/26/06, Sachin P. Sant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >So it seems that we have two conventions now. On ppc64 the start and end > >values > >will represent the size of memory, while on i386 / x86_64 they will represent > >the range [ + 1 will give the size of that memory range ]. > > > >As for this problem, if i remove the extra + 1 while computing the filesz, > >all is well and is able to save and analyze the vmcore file. > > > >Will work on a patch for this problem, but thought will get views from > >the list on this before generating a patch. Commnets :-) > > I think everyone should follow the i386 code as much as possible. > Keeping the architectures as similar makes future code merging > easier...
Sachin, did this problem ever get resolved? -- Horms H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/ _______________________________________________ fastboot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot
