Hi Stéphane, Thanks for the interesting and informative report! It appears that the big differentiator in performance is small audio feedback loops, such as used in filterbank. If this is the case, then the simple one-pole filter, "pole(p) = + ~ *(p);" should show substantially the same performance differentials as filterbank. The question then becomes whether the compiler can make use of native primitives for optimizing such constructs. One approach might be to write alternate source employing foreign functions using things like Web Audio's BiquadFilterNode (for example). It would be ideal if such primitives could be substituted by the Faust compiler, given the appropriate option(s).
- Julius On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:50 AM, Stéphane Letz <l...@grame.fr> wrote: > Hi All, > > Based on WebAssembly code generated from the wasm backend. > > Extensive testing in different situations, compiled in the post here: > http://faust.grame.fr/news/2017/09/15/backend-benchmarks.html > > Stéphane > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Faudiostream-users mailing list > faudiostream-us...@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users -- Julius O. Smith III <j...@ccrma.stanford.edu> Professor of Music and, by courtesy, Electrical Engineering CCRMA, Stanford University http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Faudiostream-devel mailing list Faudiostream-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-devel