Here's what I should have sent (attached). In my use case, I'm instancing individual modules from C++.
Yes, it would be cool to see FPP!
- Julius
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 1:01 PM Julius Smith <j...@ccrma.stanford.edu> wrote:
>
> Sorry I didn't send Stéphane's more general code - thanks for stepping in.
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 2:12 AM Stéphane Letz <l...@grame.fr> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Le 9 oct. 2018 à 10:42, Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> a écrit :
> > >
> > > On 10/08, Julius Smith wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Very nice! Stéphane's solution is to add the needed state in a
> > >> subclass of dsp defined in the architecture file. See the attached
> > >> simple example ttfs = "test ffunction with state".
> > >
> > > Heh. Thanks, now I understand what you mean.
> > >
> > > This is very inconvenient and limited. And btw, this example doesn't look
> > > right.
> > >
> > > import("stdfaust.lib");
> > >
> > > ff_smooth = ffunction(float ff_smooth(float,float),"","");
> > > ff_init = ffunction(float ff_init(float),"","");
> > >
> > > smoothness0 = 0.5;
> > > smoothness1 = 0.9;
> > > smoother(smoothness) = ff_smooth(smoothness) :
> > > attach(ff_init(ma.SR));
> > > smoother0 = smoother(smoothness0);
> > > smoother1 = smoother(smoothness1);
> > >
> > > but this will not create 2 smoothers, class State has a single "float
> > > state"
> > > initialized twice in a row, and then
> > >
> > > process = 1-1' <: smoother0 , smoother1;
> > >
> > > ff_smooth() will be called twice too; the smoothness/x args are correct
> > > but
> > > again, both calls will play with the same "state".
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Well the example with 2 states was actually this code, with explicit 2
> > State1 and State2 classes…etc..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > I modified tffs.dsp:
> > >
> > > smoother = FPP(smoothness, x) {
> > > // shared by all instances, this is only needed to create the
> > > // unique "$smoother" id printed below.
> > > DECL: int smoothers;
> > > INIT: smoothers = 0;
> > >
> > > // every instance has its own state/smother
> > > decl: int $smoother;
> > > float $state;
> > >
> > > init: $state = 0;
> > > $smoother = smoothers++;
> > >
> > > std::cout << "created smoother " << $smoother << std::endl;
> > >
> > > exec:
> > > $state = (1.0f - $smoothness) * $x + $smoothness * $state;
> > > std::cout << "smoother " << $smoother << ": " <<
> > > $smoothness << ", x: " << $x << ", y: " << $state << std::endl;
> > > $state;
> > > };
> > >
> > > smoothness0 = 0.5;
> > > smoothness1 = 0.9;
> > > smoother0 = smoother(smoothness0);
> > > smoother1 = smoother(smoothness1);
> > >
> > > process = 1-1' <: smoother0 , smoother1;
> > >
> > > then changed Makefile to run fpp instead of faust, and the output is
> > >
> > > created smoother 0
> > > created smoother 1
> > > smoother 0: 0.5, x: 1, y: 0.5
> > > smoother 1: 0.9, x: 1, y: 0.1
> > > smoother 0: 0.5, x: 0, y: 0.25
> > > smoother 1: 0.9, x: 0, y: 0.09
> > > smoother 0: 0.5, x: 0, y: 0.125
> > > smoother 1: 0.9, x: 0, y: 0.081
> > > smoother 0: 0.5, x: 0, y: 0.0625
> > > smoother 1: 0.9, x: 0, y: 0.0729
> > > smoother 0: 0.5, x: 0, y: 0.03125
> > > smoother 1: 0.9, x: 0, y: 0.06561
> > > smoother 0: 0.5, x: 0, y: 0.015625
> > > smoother 1: 0.9, x: 0, y: 0.059049
> > > smoother 0: 0.5, x: 0, y: 0.0078125
> > > smoother 1: 0.9, x: 0, y: 0.0531441
> > > smoother 0: 0.5, x: 0, y: 0.00390625
> > > smoother 1: 0.9, x: 0, y: 0.0478297
> > >
> > > which looks correct.
> > >
> > > process = 1-1' <: par(i, 10, smoother((i+1)/10));
> > >
> > > outputs
> > >
> > > created smoother 0
> > > created smoother 1
> > > created smoother 2
> > > created smoother 3
> > > created smoother 4
> > > created smoother 5
> > > created smoother 6
> > > created smoother 7
> > > created smoother 8
> > > created smoother 9
> > > smoother 0: 0.1, x: 1, y: 0.9
> > > smoother 1: 0.2, x: 1, y: 0.8
> > > smoother 2: 0.3, x: 1, y: 0.7
> > > smoother 3: 0.4, x: 1, y: 0.6
> > > smoother 4: 0.5, x: 1, y: 0.5
> > > smoother 5: 0.6, x: 1, y: 0.4
> > > smoother 6: 0.7, x: 1, y: 0.3
> > > smoother 7: 0.8, x: 1, y: 0.2
> > > smoother 8: 0.9, x: 1, y: 0.1
> > > smoother 9: 1, x: 1, y: 0
> > > ...
> > >
> > > No need to create a subclass, no need to write the additional C++ code,
> > > etc.
> > >
> > > Oleg.
> > >
> >
> > Julius initial demand was more limited, and the proposed solution was
> > enough I think.
> >
> > OK your solution seems more general, so we are interested to see your FPP
> > code ((-;
> >
> > Stéphane
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Julius O. Smith III <j...@ccrma.stanford.edu>
> Professor of Music and, by courtesy, Electrical Engineering
> CCRMA, Stanford University
> http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/
--
Julius O. Smith III <j...@ccrma.stanford.edu>
Professor of Music and, by courtesy, Electrical Engineering
CCRMA, Stanford University
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/
tffs.tgz
Description: application/gzip
_______________________________________________ Faudiostream-devel mailing list Faudiostream-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-devel
