On 09/02, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Hmm... but I don't understand what exactly the new neutralExpSeq() function
> does... Say,
>
> f = _,_;
> seq0 = seq(i,0,f);
> process = inputs(seq0), outputs(seq0);
>
> outputs 2,2. Good. However,
>
> f = _,_ :> _;
> or
> f = +;
>
> results in 1,1 and this doesn't look consistent to me...
OK, I seem to understans. So, if we have
seq0 = seq(i,0,f);
then
inputs(seq0) == outputs(seq0) == outputs(f)
neutralExpSeq() doesn't take 'ins' into account. perhaps
it should complain when ins != outs?
> And with
> f(x,y) = x+y;
>
> I get
>
> boxType() internal error : unrecognized box expression
> closure[\x.(\y.(x,y : +)), genv = {}, lenv = {}]
just in case, even
f(x) = x;
leads to the same problem, looks like a bug ;)
Oleg.
_______________________________________________
Faudiostream-devel mailing list
Faudiostream-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-devel
