Hi,
Did you try to compile with -double or -quad when you increased the range?
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Aidan O Boyle <aidan.o-bo...@ucdconnect.ie>
wrote:
> Hi Kjetil,
>
> Thank you very much for the response. Yes you understand the problem
> correctly. The numeric entry next to a QT slider display the correct number
> of digits but truncates the number displayed to three decimal places.
>
> I think you're theory is right, it certainly seems likely that the numeric
> entries can support a higher precision than the sliders. I tired changing
> the hardcoded range but it had no effect. I will settle for 3 decimal
> places for now :).
>
> Regards,
> Aidan.
>
> On 4 August 2016 at 15:50, Kjetil Matheussen <k.s.matheus...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> If I understand you correctly, the problem is that you can not write,
>> for instance, "0.0000001" into a numeric entry?
>> Looking quickly at faustqt.h, it seems like the sliders are hardcoded
>> to support a range of only 10000.
>>
>> A theory why it doesn't work to set
>> very accurate numbers in the numeric entry would be that the
>> numeric entry widget signals the new value to the slider, which
>> doesn't support that kind of accuracy, so it converts it, and then
>> sends it back again to the numeric entry with less accuracy.
>>
>> If this is the reason, it might work to change all the hardocded "10000"
>> values in faustqt.h / uiSlider into something much bigger.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Aidan O Boyle <
>> aidan.o-bo...@ucdconnect.ie> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I am having difficulty getting the correct precision for the numeric
>>> display of sliders (vertical or horizontal). This is the case both with GTK
>>> and QT. My problem is that I would like to specify a slider step of say,
>>> 0.000001. The QT app numerical entry field to the right of the slider
>>> displays a number with this same precision however only the first three
>>> decimal places are actually used (the last three remain 0). Furthermore the
>>> step size implemented is actually 0.002.
>>>
>>> So where a slider is coded as follows:
>>> s0 = hslider("h(0)", 0, -5, 5, 0.000001);
>>>
>>> The behavior as it is incremented either by the slider or numeric entry
>>> (QT app only, GTK app does not have a configurable one):
>>> 0.002000 -> 0.004000 -> 0.006000 -> 0.008000 -> 0.010000 ...
>>>
>>> This is also the precision of the slider/numeric entry when the step is
>>> specified as 0.0001 or 0.00001. Why does it behave like this? - Defaulting
>>> to 3 decimal places with a step of 0.002?
>>>
>>> However coding a slider like:
>>> s0 = hslider("h(0)", 0, -5, 5, 0.001);
>>>
>>> It works as it should:
>>> 0.001 -> 0.002 -> 0.003 -> 0.004 ...
>>>
>>> So I am wondering if I am missing something? I have tried compiling
>>> using -quad and -double options but this has no effect. I had some
>>> (beginners) luck getting a step with this many decimal places for a GTK
>>> numeric entry but only because I compiled inline and altered the UI class
>>> to specify the precision of the step. Is there a way active widgets like
>>> the above can be made to abide to this many decimal places for a step?
>>>
>>> Sorry for a n00bish question, I am new to Faust. Any help/clarity would
>>> be much appreciated.
>>>
>>> Regards, Aidan.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Faudiostream-users mailing list
>>> Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
