Since Faust is a compiled language, I would vote for @(1). On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 5:54 AM Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 09/10, Julius Smith wrote: > > > > I personally think Faust should stay in > > the "real time" paradigm and not offer this. > > I agree but how this connects to > > process = @(2) : @(-1); > > which used to work? This code is equivalent to > > process = @(1); > > and normalizeFixedDelayTerm() even has a comment: > > // (x@n)@m = x@(n+m) > > in "if (isSigFixDelay(s, x, y)" block which does this transform... > > Oleg. > >
-- Julius O. Smith III <j...@ccrma.stanford.edu> Professor of Music and, by courtesy, Electrical Engineering CCRMA, Stanford University http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/ _______________________________________________ Faudiostream-users mailing list Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
