Personally, I'd love that too. Currently, what is the condition that determines whether a function is expanded or not in the diagrams?
Best, Dario On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 02:29, Julius Smith <j...@ccrma.stanford.edu> wrote: > I think it would be great if there were NO function expansion when > drawing block diagrams. Then we would have complete control by means > of naming expressions. For convenience, there could be a source-code > pragma indicating to expand a particular function, or a Faust compiler > option such as -svgx functionName. > > - Julius > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 12:10 PM Dario Sanfilippo > <sanfilippo.da...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, list. > > > > Say that I have the following code: > > > > system = +; > > process = system ~ _; > > > > Is there a way to force the generation of the SVG diagram to represent > "system" as a unit (the clickable blue box, so to speak) rather than having > the "+" on the diagram surrounded by the dashed square and the "system" > label? > > > > Thanks, > > Dario > > _______________________________________________ > > Faudiostream-users mailing list > > Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users > > > > -- > > Julius O. Smith III <j...@ccrma.stanford.edu> > Professor of Music and, by courtesy, Electrical Engineering > CCRMA, Stanford University > http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/ >
_______________________________________________ Faudiostream-users mailing list Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
