Hello, list.
If we consider the code
inspect(i, lower, upper) = no.noise <: attach(_ ,
_ : hbargraph("sig_%i
[style:numerical]",
lower,
upper));
process = inspect(0, -100, 100);
we can see that the resolution in the displayed values is gone and that
only three values represent the signal. This is because of the resolution
being dependent on the display range.
Even if the range matched that of the inspected signal, the resolution is
only up to the hundredths.
In my networks, I have control signals at extremely low rates, .001Hz and
sometimes lower than that, and it would be vital for me to be able to
inspect the signals to see how they're behaving while the network is
running.
I often use external signals from microphones so I can't really use
faust2plot or faust2csvplot.
Would it be possible to have the displayed values consistent with the
bit-depth resolution the compiler is called with (-double, in most cases)
regardless of the range set in *bargraph?
Thanks,
Dario
_______________________________________________
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
