So, is this:
process(f1,f2,m1,m2) = (os.osc(*(m1)+f1):os.osc(*(m2)+f2:abs)) ~ _;
preferable to this:
process(f1,f2,m1,m2) =
(os.osc(((_,m1:*),f1):+):os.osc(((_,m2:*),f2):+:abs)) ~ _;
or this:
process(f1,f2,m1,m2) = ((((_,m1:*),f1):+:os.osc,m2:*),f2:+:abs:os.osc) ~ _;
Are fewer parenthesis better? Is infix cleaner than postfix? I certainly
appreciate the cleanliness of your code.
Sam
On May 22, 2020 at 11:46:42 AM, Dario Sanfilippo (sanfilippo.da...@gmail.com)
wrote:
That's on me for being lazy, Oleg :) I didn't change Sam's code at all and
I just moved the ~ at the end :)
Dario
On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 18:42, Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Dario, sorry for noise but I simply can't resist...
>
> On 05/22, Dario Sanfilippo wrote:
> >
> > process(carFreq, modFreq, modModMult, indexMult) = (
> > (
> > (
> > (_, hslider("modModMult",100,100,1000,1):*),
> > hslider("modFreq",100,100,1000,1):+
> > ):os.osc, hslider("carModMult",100,100,1000,1):*
> > )
> > , hslider("carFreq",100,100,1000,1):+:os.osc
> > ) ~_ , 0.1:*;
>
> I am wondering how do you manage to understand this code ;)
>
> I wasn't able until I simplified it to
>
> m1 = hslider("modModMult",100,100,1000,1);
> f1 = hslider("modFreq",100,100,1000,1);
> m2 = hslider("carModMult",100,100,1000,1);
> f2 = hslider("carFreq",100,100,1000,1);
>
> process = (osc(m1,f1) : osc(m2,f2)) ~ _ : *(0.1)
> with {
> osc(m,f) = os.osc(*(m) + f);
> };
>
> Oleg.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
