Hi Klaus,

I am late to this (just read some of the thread with interest), and I have
a question: what do you mean by "1 > corr(t,l,r) > 0" ?  It appears to be
"parsed" left to right, so that the 2nd ">" only sees "1>0" most (all?) of
the time, which is always true (1) of course (so no "else" activated).
Maybe you want something like "abs(corr(t,l,r)) > 0.95" ?  (i.e., 95%
correlation deemed to be "panned mono").  I'm taking the absolute value
because I assume you don't care if the left channel is merely the negative
of the right (unless that's an accepted cheezy "stereoizer" of sorts).

FYI, this is what we call a time-domain "normalized cross-correlation" or
"correlation coefficient" measurement (official buzzwords)

Cheers,
Julius


On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 10:07 AM Klaus Scheuermann <kla...@posteo.de> wrote:

> Dear Dario,
>
> cool, your corr function gives me the desired results. At least when
> feeding it to a meter.
>
> Here is my test audio which contains vocals in mono-mid, mono-left,
> mono-right, mono-half-left, mono-half-right, stereo:
> https://cloud.4ohm.de/s/y9oZzqFGyrZT5ej
> For mono-mid, mono-half-left, mono-half-right it shows 1.
> For mono-left, mono-right it shows 0.
> For stereo it shows values between 0 and 1.
>
> I would like to detect mono signals that are not exactly in the middle and
> put them there. Stereo signals should be unchanged.
>
> My code is here, but for some reason it does not work correctly.
> Especially when corr shows 0, ba.if does not go to the else-path.
>
> import("stdfaust.lib");
> avg(t, x) = fi.pole(p, (1 - p) * x) // 1-pole lowpass as average
> with {
> p = exp((((-2.0 * ma.PI) / t) / ma.SR));
> };
> var(t, x) = avg(t, (x - avg(t, x)) ^ 2); // variance
> sd(t, x) = sqrt(var(t, x)); // standard deviation
> cov(t, x1, x2) = avg(t, (x1 - avg(t, x1)) * (x2 - avg(t, x2))); //
> covariance
> corr(t, x1, x2) = cov(t, x1, x2) / (sd(t, x1) * sd(t, x2)) : _ ; //
> correlation
> t = 0.5; // averaging period in seconds
> correlate_meter(x,y) = x,y <: x , attach(y, (corr(t) : hbargraph("corr",-1
> ,1))) : _,_;
> correlate_correct(t,l,r) = ba.if(1 > corr(t,l,r) > 0 , l, (l+r)) , ba.if(1
> > corr(t,l,r) > 0 , r, (l+r));
> process = _,_ : correlate_meter : correlate_correct(t);
>
> Am I doing the ba.if wrong?
>
> Thank s very much,
> Klaus
>
>
> On 04.08.21 18:25, Dario Sanfilippo wrote:
>
> I had implemented a few statistics function a while back, kindly taken
> from Wikipedia, and they seem to produce the expected values mentioned on
> the webpage. I hope that these can be useful.
>
> Ciao,
> Dr Dario Sanfilippo
> http://dariosanfilippo.com
>
> import("stdfaust.lib");
> avg(t, x) = fi.pole(p, (1 - p) * x) // 1-pole lowpass as average
> with {
> p = exp((((-2.0 * ma.PI) / t) / ma.SR));
> };
> var(t, x) = avg(t, (x - avg(t, x)) ^ 2); // variance
> sd(t, x) = sqrt(var(t, x)); // standard deviation
> cov(t, x1, x2) = avg(t, (x1 - avg(t, x1)) * (x2 - avg(t, x2))); //
> covariance
> corr(t, x1, x2) = cov(t, x1, x2) / (sd(t, x1) * sd(t, x2)); // correlation
> ph0 = os.phasor(2.0 * ma.PI, 200);
> red = sin(ph0) + .35 * sin(ph0 * 3.0) + .91 * sin(ph0 * 5.0);
> blue = sin(ph0) + .5 * sin(ph0 * 3.0) - .5 * sin(ph0 * 5.0);
> red1 = sin(ph0) + sin(ph0 * 3.0);
> blue1 = sin(ph0) - sin(ph0 * 3.0) / 3.0;
> t = 1.0; // averaging period in seconds
> process = (red , blue : corr(t)) , (red1 , blue1 : corr(t));
>
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 at 16:52, Klaus Scheuermann <kla...@posteo.de> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Giuseppe,
>>
>> I checked it out, but somehow it still does not give me the desired
>> result...
>> I did some more research and found this, which indicates that it can be
>> done with arctan more easily.
>>
>> The way this is done on phase (correlation) meters in audio equipment is
>> rather simple:
>>
>> Phase = arctan(L/R)
>>
>> With phase of 45 or 225 = 1, and phase of 135 and 315 (-45) is -1.
>>
>> Essentially, the Y Axis is the L, and the X axis is the R. The phase is
>> simply the polar angle of the vector between the two.
>>
>> This type of meters will show 1 if the signal is mono, and -1 if the left
>> and right are perfectly phase inverted.
>>
>> Notice however, that phase meters of this type also account for the
>> magnitude in the polar coordinates. So:
>>
>> Magnitude = (L^2 + R^2)^1/2
>>
>> Thus the actual meter display is a normalised version of:
>>
>> Correlation = Phase * Magnitude
>>
>> I'm not sure that satisfies your requirements, but this answers the
>> question in the subject.
>>
>> So I transfered this to faust, but it still behaves weired...
>> import("stdfaust.lib");
>> phase(l,r) = (l/r) : aa.arctan;
>> magnitude(l,r) = (l^2 + r^2)^1/2;
>> correlate(l,r) = phase(l,r) * magnitude(l,r);
>> correlate_meter(x,y) = x,y <: x , attach(y, (correlate : hbargraph("corr"
>> ,-1,1))) : _,_;
>> process = _,_ : correlate_meter: _,_;
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Klaus
>>
>> On 03.08.21 14:48, Giuseppe Silvi wrote:
>>
>> Hi Klaus,
>> The filters are necessary to obtain a -1 +1 range, I think.
>>
>> import("stdfaust.lib");
>>
>> correlate(l,r) = l*l ,r*r , l*r : par(i,3, si.smooth(0.9)) : sqrt, sqrt, _ : 
>> *,_ : /;
>> correlate_meter(x,y) = x,y <: x , attach(y, (correlate : 
>> hbargraph("corr”,-1,1)));
>>
>> process = correlate_meter;
>>
>> Try playing with the si.smooth coefficient.
>>
>> best,
>> giuseppe
>>
>>
>> On 3 Aug 2021, at 14:09, Klaus Scheuermann <kla...@posteo.de> 
>> <kla...@posteo.de> wrote:
>>
>> Could it be something like this?
>>
>> (according to the 'correct' algorithm in 
>> https://www.beis.de/Elektronik/Correlation/CorrelationCorrectAndWrong.html )
>> import("stdfaust.lib");
>>
>> correlate(l,r) = l*l ,r*r , l*r : sqrt, sqrt, _ : *,_ : / :_;
>> correlate_meter(x,y) = x,y <: x , attach(y, (correlate : 
>> hbargraph("corr",-1,1))) : _,_;
>>
>> process = _,_ : correlate_meter: _,_;
>>
>> I am not sure about the lowpass filters though. Maybe not needed in the 
>> digital domain?
>>
>> Also, my code only returns -1 or 1 while it should be returning a range of 
>> -1 and 1, right?
>>
>> The correlation is either expressed in % from -100% to +100% or as the 
>> correlation factor, which ranges from -1 to +1. Note that due to the 
>> correlation algorithm the level of both signals does not matter, i.e., it 
>> does not influence the measured result.
>>
>> When a mono source is used for a stereo signal both stereo channels will be 
>> +100% correlated. When e.g. in a stereo signal both channels contain 
>> completely different signals, e.g. left (and only left) is the trumpet and 
>> right (and only right) is the guitar these stereo channels will be 0% 
>> correlated. With a third instrument appearing in both channels, the 
>> correlation will be somewhere between 0 and +100%.
>>
>>
>> Ideas?
>> Danke :)
>> Klaus
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03.08.21 12:48, Klaus Scheuermann wrote:
>>
>> Hello List,
>>
>> I just wondered, if anyone has implemented a stereo audio correlation
>> meter/analyser in faust?
>>
>> If yes - great!
>> If no - I have another project :)
>>
>> Here is what I found about the algorithm(s):
>> https://www.beis.de/Elektronik/Correlation/CorrelationCorrectAndWrong.html
>>
>>
>> I never learned analog electronic schematics, but it seems it should not
>> be extremely hard to transfer to faust.
>>
>> Cheers, Klaus
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Faudiostream-users mailing list
>> Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Faudiostream-users mailing 
>> listFaudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Faudiostream-users mailing list
>> Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Faudiostream-users mailing list
> Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
>


-- 
"Anybody who knows all about nothing knows everything" -- Leonard Susskind
_______________________________________________
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users

Reply via email to