Thanks, Romain! In that case I'll stick to faust2ck for now. However, for those who may want to use FaucK, I found a problems with Faust.chug (I had posted it in the ChucK forum, since Faust.chug is in the ChucK chugins release, but I'll cc it below). Cheers! Daniel ----------- 1. I downloaded the pre-compiled Faust.chug binary per the install script in https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~rmichon/fauck/ However, OSX (Big Sur) complains that it's from an unsigned developer, whether I use it w/ chuck from the term, or from the miniaudicle. I know how to enable OSX apps from unsigned developers - is there a way to have OSX let me do likewise for .chugs (i.e., .o) files?
2. Also, I tried to make Faust.chug from sources (cloned *https://github.com/ccrma/chugins <https://github.com/ccrma/chugins>*), but got fatal compile errors: >>> cd chugins/Faust/; make osx clang++ -c -o Faust.o Faust.cpp -mmacosx-version-min=10.9 -D__MACOSX_CORE__ -I../chuck/include -arch x86_64 -fPIC -I/usr/local/include -O3 In file included from Faust.cpp:35: In file included from /usr/local/include/faust/dsp/llvm-dsp.h:37: */usr/local/include/faust/dsp/dsp.h:246:52: **error: **expected ';' at end of declaration list* void setFpStatusRegister(intptr_t fpsr_aux) noexcept *^* ; In file included from Faust.cpp:37: */usr/local/include/faust/gui/PathBuilder.h:69:31: **error: **non-aggregate type 'std::vector<char>' cannot be initialized with an initializer list* std::vector<char> rep = {' ', '#', '*', ',', '/', '?', '[', ']', '{', '}', '(', ')'}; *^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~* 2 errors generated. make: *** [Faust.o] Error 1 On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 3:15 AM Romain Michon <rmnmic...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Beside the fact that FaucK allows you to do on-the-fly compilation of > Faust programs directly in ChucK, there's no real benefit in terms of using > it vs. faust2ck. It's just more convenient if you need to prototype Faust > programs directly in ChucK. If your Faust program is always the same, using > faust2ck might be a better option. > > Cheers, > > Romain > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 10:18 PM Daniel Chapiro <dchap...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks, Stéphane! Also, do you know if there any advantage in using FaucK >> (Faust.chug) instead of faust2ck? (I don't do on-the-fly Chuck programming) >> >
_______________________________________________ Faudiostream-users mailing list Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
