On 05/09, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> See the attached test-case. If you want to compile it, you need
> fpp (https://github.com/oleg-nesterov/fpp), maxima, and Linux.
>
> Compiled with '-a plot.cpp'
>
>       $ ./test-plot -n 100000 | tail -n 1
>       0.00285841338           0.000623551081
>
> As you can see, taylor() uses less memory and it is more accurate
> at least in this particular case.

On second thought...

I recalled that ba.tabulate().cub works badly near r0 and r1 and I guess
tabulateNd().cub inherits this problem.

So perhaps bicubic will work better than taylor if this problem is fixed.

Oleg.



_______________________________________________
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users

Reply via email to