Crosbie Fitch wrote:
If ORG wish to be seen as loony compromisers adopting the logical fallacy of
'appeal to moderation', well that's up to them.

If it also means ORG are happy to give their tacit blessing to FC-UK for it
to take an abolitionist stance, well, let's roll!

If anyone needs a public advocate for abolition, count me in the shortlist.
;-)


ooo-er. Can we confirm that includes patent abolition as well as copyright - but not author's rights? Every time an argument comes up over copyright (or patents applied to 'soft' things), people seem to find it necessary to show how they are actually moderates at heart by saying 'of course patents for hardware and medicine are perfectly reasonable'. Well, they may have been once but they are not any more; they are just a tool to create barriers to entry to markets, generate oligopolies, and screw consumers..

rant over..

Graham

_______________________________________________
fc-uk-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/fc-uk-discuss


_______________________________________________
fc-uk-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/fc-uk-discuss

Reply via email to