Hello Vasu,

Every now and then I receive an e-mail from an FCoE user who runs an
older kernel reporting an issue that was fixed by the patches that were
accepted upstream in kernel 3.13 (see also
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.scsi.open-fcoe.devel/12132). This
made me wonder what the policy is for sending patches to the stable tree
? The list of patches I would like to see being sent to the stable tree
is as follows (tested on top of kernel v3.10.62):

648a179a5a28f2f16efc4711fb5a4c38d1ef1ceb
    libfc: Reject PLOGI from nodes with incompatible role
129a350a92fa6ea19c6ff3a60d0424ea76989060
    fcoe: Fix smatch warning in fcoe_fdmi_info function
86a78a3157c292fc73dc2bcb11609f8ed973437a
    fcoe: fix the link error status block sparse warnings
38446b470d49567aa1b55045e65dc3bb9be40b2a
    libfc: Differentiate echange timer cancellation debug statements
14122e6901ea4b89a7a58b75e6bc2e9db17c768d
    libfcoe: Fix meaningless log statement
5a95e4d9b51622a99d881b9f415413158782a034
    fcoe: Stop fc_rport_priv structure leak
ca1e26dace27b08aab4406c7542f12956b996c6c
    fcoe: Reduce number of sparse warnings
a6f50989c73f51fd0208b0f7fb38c8ef369b940e
    fcoe: ensure that skb placed on the fip_recv_list are unshared
fe594938f703884e8531a985bdf8f055ff6f797c
    fcoe: make sure fcoe frames are unshared prior to manipulating them
29bce4de2b36291e52a027e7b656a8332674ef4e
    fcoe: cleanup return codes from fcoe_rcv
f596d9a0cca64bcc635b21c76f7ea426b7dc48d2
    libfc: Source code comment spelling fixes
93b31c44dee5f6a3d193e0a91fd1842a16fe8e9e
    libfc: Debug code fixes
9005094109bd4cce7e8ad90f619f4726b03a59b9
    libfc: Micro-optimize fc_setup_exch_mgr()
2d56fbdfd947a81905e4f2551d95705a85aad08b
    libfc: Clarify fc_exch_find()
e3f112a7cc51427ee9938026168c95a3cedab037
    libfc: Fix a race in fc_exch_timer_set_locked()
d174e95ed5ff812bd11b8b2d098e81b2ba266e22
    libfc: Protect ep->esb_stat changes via ex_lock
8b1567d9603c87857eab1869a57e66ee4915716d
    libfc: Avoid that sending after an abort triggers a kernel warning
c946a1c2d92ea54cddebc1ac2204e214dc63692e
    libfc: Reduce exchange lock contention in fc_exch_recv_abts()
b52181d2bf17ab7eb2a0fb1f76e45d7adbad645d
    libfc: Do not invoke the response handler after fc_exch_done()
78bf612e8f2af71d4f7453d9cf35eaa67403c825
    fcp: Do not interpret check condition as underrun
6c40010e03547930fc5465087a72080cdabf6d24
    fcoe: Declare fcoe_ctlr_mode_set() static
d72ad2b74816b9920659093ed609a6c391287f5c
    fcoe: Add missing newlines in debug messages
180db363920cdbf5d7462b1d6fb6a999071a0d4d
    fcoe: Reduce fcoe_sysfs_fcf_add() stack usage
f298717281fc505949fcf6bdf5ba051fa65759b3
    libfcoe: Make fcoe_sysfs optional / fix fnic NULL exception
a08cdd23d184bd01f26ba3e3cff056bed60aa90a
    fcoe: Fix missing mutex_unlock in fcoe_sysfs_fcf_add error path

Thanks,

Bart.
_______________________________________________
fcoe-devel mailing list
fcoe-devel@open-fcoe.org
http://lists.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/fcoe-devel

Reply via email to